Comments on: June 07 Comparison: XBox 360 Graphics vs. PS3 Graphics

By: zain

zain — Thu, 15 May 2008 21:17:01 +0000

well lisen, a dunno wat 2 buy tbh!
a keep changing mymind 2 ps3 to xbox elite
am always changin ma mind
more ma mates have the xbox and sum a gud mates have the ps3.
a prefer the sexbox but

ryt let’s cut to the chase, a ps3 has aBLUE-RAY disk, it holds upto so much graphics becaue of the memory the blue-ray can take. am not sure how much memory it has but alot more that a DVD disk format,
so inturn.. the xbox games “great graphics” is all squeezed in .

the xbox elite’s graphics for fight night 3 is nuffin compared 2 the ps3 ones

all a can say is, it’s ur own choice on wat u want 2 buy init

By: Minimoose

Minimoose — Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:01:25 +0000

“xbox is using 95 % of there power,ps3 is using 35% and its alredy kicking 360’s ass,!!LOL!!”

I’d like to know where you are getting these COMPLETELY ACCURATE STATISTICS [/sarcasm]

I’m not biased by any means, I own all three next-gen consoles. Every game that I have played has looked better on the 360. Now I know that developers “haven’t reached the potential” of the PS3….but I sort of doubt they ever will, from what I here it’s too cumbersome. And by now developers have had ample time to work programming magic. Now mind you, the PS3 games have been improving…but still don’t seem up to par, especially with all those jaggies distorting things. (Something that has plagued every Sony console) MSG4 looks good, but we’ll see about the frame rates.

Enough bickering, I’m gonna go play DREAMCAST!!

By: Bagel Shops » June 07 Comparison: XBox 360 Graphics vs. PS3 Graphics Armillary …

Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:34:41 +0000

[...] To find more information from the source here [...]

By: Tone Capone

Tone Capone — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:06:12 +0000

I believe the 360 is way better in graphics and just about everything else. ps3 i had and returned. it just wansnt for me. then again i have spent damn near 800 on optimising my system…GEARS OF WAR BABY!

By: bob

bob — Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:20:15 +0000

If u ask me
why pay £100-200 more for a slight better graphics, when graphics arnt all u should see in a game, a game is good when its got game play, sure the graphics should b up to date but ther near enoug hthe same and i go for value for money and thats the 360
and the ps3 pic looks fake.

By: Mystik_Soul_Dragon

Mystik_Soul_Dragon — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:48:05 +0000

i agree wit smitty . we now only want games just for the graphic. sheesh

By: Mystik_Soul_Dragon

Mystik_Soul_Dragon — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:46:49 +0000

forget halo. call of duty is the one. don’t care what system its on but its kickass

By: smitty

smitty — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:40:55 +0000

whatever happened to the time when instead of Awsome graphics, we enjoyed a good game with a good story? halo, assassins creed, knights of the old republic, unreal, startrek star fleet academy, duke nukem, half life(the original). what do all these have in common? STORY. as long as the graphics are tolerable and the gameplay is fun and the story makes sense and draws you in, then what more do you need?
to close my point, why are atari, nes, snes, mame, and so on emulators around? because they have games that made the next generation, not because of graphics, but because of gameplay. look into the past and see that games have nothing to do with graphics. it has everything to do with gameplay, storyline.

By: OMEN

OMEN — Sun, 23 Dec 2007 22:40:59 +0000

xbox is using 95 % of there power,ps3 is using 35% and its alredy kicking 360’s ass,!!LOL!!

By: Idetrorce

Idetrorce — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:06:52 +0000

very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
Idetrorce