Not Dead Yet

The Volokh Conspiracy links to this opinion by Judge Boyce Martin of the Sixth Circuit, where she declares:

Because collateral estoppel precludes future litigation of one specific issue, and because that is what the state effectively asks us to find, we construe their argument as one for collateral estoppel rather than res judicata, despite the substitution of one term for the other in the state’s brief.

Noting in a footnote: “Because Latin is a dead language anyway.”

But wait! Judge Alice Batchelder rides to the rescue! In her concurring opinion, she writes:

I concur in Judge Martin’s opinion.
I write separately only to express my suspicion that, like the reports of Mark Twain’s death, see The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy (Third Edition, 2002), the report of the death of Latin in the majority opinion’s footnote 5 is greatly exaggerated.

Hooray for Judge Batchelder! Lingua latina per aeternam!

add to Add to Blinkslist add to furl Digg it add to ma.gnolia Stumble It! add to simpy seed the vine TailRank



Filed under Appellate Law, Culture, Humor, Languages

17 responses to “Not Dead Yet

  1. Pingback: Would You Care for Little Latin with That? | The California Blog of Appeal

  2. Pingback: Obtaining a Name Change in Montana « Armillary Observations

  3. Отличный пост. Хочу тоже поделиться прикольной ссылкой – скачать NFS Undercover

  4. И как же это можно понять простому человеку?

  5. И неужели это все так работает???

  6. Скромность укрощает человека.

  7. Бошка разболелась. Необходимо что-либо править в своем безуспешном бизнесе. Между тем перерегистрация ООО – невероятно актуальная тема в настоящий момент. Не профукать бы. Задачу надо решить до конца 2008 года. Крамбец.

  8. Скорей бы старость, да в детство впасть.

  9. Чувствуется у вас в блоге какой-то уют

  10. Cool information. If you have free time, pleas came to my site. Thith is it – internet spades.

  11. Автор молодец. Затронул тему до глубины. Кстати хочу тоже поделится некоторыми открытиями – Трахеобронхомегалия. Я сам в шоке

  12. discussed here I am not sure I agree with some of the commenters here though! Wow is all I can say. Thanks again.. Hope you

  13. I’ve to admit that i generally get bored to learn the whole thing but i feel you possibly can add some value. Bravo !

  14. A single vote doesn’t have any influence and all our babble is mostly what Patri Friedman calls “folk activism”. Nevertheless, I’ll continue complaining about the unconstitutional New Deal regulatory state, imperial executive, wars of choice etc. I also think replacing the Articles of Confederation with the Constitution was a mistake, but from a legal perspective it did at least result in written law that can be followed by officials and provides a modicum of constraint, if only for the effect it has on public opinion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s